haibun

| Current Issue | About CHO | Editorial Staff & Guidelines | Submissions | Articles | Archives | Search |
October 2018, vol 14 no 3

| Contents This Issue | Next |



Ken Jones


Editor's Note: In 2015, we announced the death of Ken Jones, one of haibun's outstanding literary poets. Along with founder Jim Kacian and co-editor Bruce Ross, Ken edited CHO during it's first 10 years of publication. In 2005, Ken posted a four-part series called "Ken's Corner" which we think is sufficiently rich and which few of our current readers were around to have read. So we've decided to repost the series starting with this issue.
                                                                       ~ Ray Rasmussen


Ken’s Corner - Part 1

Dear Haibuneer,

Several times each week it’s “Hi, guys -- more grist!” from our editor-in-chief Jim Kacian, with another e-mail full of hopeful submissions. But sadly at least some three-quarters turn out to be just chaff, without sufficient nourishment in them to offer to our readers.

The purpose of this regular column is to reduce the percentage of declined submissions. It is frustrating to have to reject promising work which the writer might well be able to improve, given a clearer idea of what the editors are looking for, and given a bit of encouraging advice. And it’s discouraging for you to have work rejected without being able to figure out why. When you have been enabled to do so you may decide that haibun writing is not really what you thought it was and is not for you. Or you may decide to get down to learning how to turn your experiences into haibun literature. You can do this by studying examples of good haibun and our articles and archives.

The first question to ask yourself is whether you can write passable haiku, since these are the nuts and bolts of haibun. Do you find that your freestanding haiku are being declined by the various editors of different reputable haiku magazines? If so, it may be time to join a haiku group, study books like Lee Gurga’s Haiku: a Poet’s Guide, remedy your weaknesses, and get yourself published. Then come back to having a go at haibun.

In about half the haibun we receive the “haiku” appear as little more than three lines of cut-up prose. The basic test is whether your haiku stand out distinctively from the prose. If the three lines can be folded back into the prose without making a ripple, then that’s where they belong. But try collapsing an authentic haiku back into the prose and it will still show up there as a different animal. Of course, there is much more to be said about the place of haiku in haibun, but let’s first get the haiku into existence.

How about the haibun as a whole, with particular reference to the prose? You may be moved to report your holiday experiences in some exotic place, or tell the readers what happened to you on your way to work, or recount a family anecdote. These are all potential topics, but if they read as little different from the hundreds of holiday letters home, or passages from The National Geographic Magazine, or the thousands of after-dinner anecdotes that are told, then they really do not have anything special for our readers and we cannot accept them. What is being submitted in such cases is the raw material for a haibun that has yet to be crafted into literature. There’s no literary nourishment in it.

What does nourish is work that engages our feelings and stirs our imagination. The writing is rich in striking and original imagery, as well as being concrete and economical. It enhances a reader's experience of the world around us. It offers a little bit of heart-warming humanity and makes a modest contribution to sustaining and enriching our lives. Yes, this is serious stuff, and the more so in being undertaken in the haiku spirit of karumi, of lightness of touch.

I’ll take up from there in the next issue.

                                                                       ~ Ken Jones


Editor's Note: Ken Jones' piece was edited a bit for readability and timeliness; the substance is unchanged.


logo